Today, we at SFC, along with our OpenWrt member project, announce the production release of the OpenWrt One. This is the first wireless Internet router designed and built with your software freedom and right to repair in mind. The OpenWrt One will never be locked down and is forever unbrickable. This device services your needs as its owner and user. Everyone deserves control of their computing. The OpenWrt One takes a great first step toward bringing software rights to your home: you can control your own network with the software of your choice, and ensure your right to change, modify, and repair it as you like.
  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    27·
    21 days ago

    This device specs vs price aren’t appropriate in any way. There’s no point paying 100€ for something that only has 2 Ethernet ports, doesn’t have modern WiFi and only 1GB of RAM and an older CPU.

    Besides the whole title and movement is a but misleading because the guys from Banana Pi shipped multiple boards already that are built for OpenWrt and have things like WiFi 6 in that price point. One of them is the “Banana Pi BPI-Wifi6 Router” for 60€ and more expensive the Banana Pi R3 that that just makes a lot more sense.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      11·
      21 days ago

      Seems cheaper where we are $89 CAD so €68. 1 gig RAM is plenty for a router. I’m running OpenMediaVault Samba shares and MiniDLNA on 256MB RAM and it doesn’t max out. More RAM would be wasted on a router.

      • TCB13@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        20 days ago

        Check this out, the router from the link for someone in Europe:

        Now the other ones:

        I guess you get the point, all Openwrt routers and the last one is much much better in all ways.

  • GNUmer@sopuli.xyz
    261·
    21 days ago

    No love for Turris? They’ve basically just added an easier web management UI alongside lUCI and their devices are specifically designed to run OpenWRT. Also they’ve sent a fair amount of patches to upstream (search the OpenWRT git repos for authors with @nic.cz email addresses)

    https://turris.com/

  • whaleross@lemmy.world
    9·
    21 days ago

    The two things that decide this device is not for me:

    1. WiFi 6 when 7 is already in the shops. The wifi portion of the router will be obsolete very soon.

    2. I need one uplink and 3-4 ethernet ports. Consumer WiFi routers have this.

    So I’m just staying patient for my eventual upgrade from WiFi 5 to 7. I’d been more interested in a non brickable OpenWrt 1+4/8 ethernet device and get me a separate WiFi bridge.

    • DynamoSunshirtSandals@possumpat.io
      101·
      21 days ago

      I’m not sure WiFi 6 will be “obsolete” in even 10 years, let alone ‘soon’. I’m still using AC just fine at home. If your ISP sucks as much as most, you won’t benefit from much anyway. Maybe the new frequencies could help for apartment dwellers, or the intranet speeds could help if you transfer a lot to and from a home NAS?

      • whaleross@lemmy.world
        4·
        21 days ago

        I agree that “obsolete” is an exaggeration, but from my point of view I’m making an upgrade from WiFi 5. WiFi 7 has way better throughout and possibly better real life coverage than 6, so I have no reason to settle with WiFi 6 when 7 is about to be readily available. I live in an apartment with plenty of competitors for the frequencies with good internet speed and plenty of NAS-ish use. And as mentioned, I was only sharing my personal reasons for why this isn’t a box for me. Maybe it is great for you and I’d be happy to learn more about your use case.

        • DynamoSunshirtSandals@possumpat.io
          2·
          20 days ago

          My use-case is quite basic: a single combined home server/NAS, and two remote workers. My biggest obstacle, historically, was buffer bloat, which really really annoys me in video calls. I’ve got it to an acceptable level these days but it still isn’t ideal.

          In a perfect world, I’d have a single home server box that does wifi, routing, NAS, jellyfin, DNS, movies, freshRSS, backups, and a few other tasks. And then I’d eventually build another and mirror data between the two in another location for redundancy. But I haven’t found anything that can handle it on mostly FOSS, long-term-security-updated software (10 years minimum), with no required subscriptions, with easily repairable or replaceable hardware. This seems to be getting really close, though! Official openVPN support for a piece of hardware would go a long way. I made a mistake buying a router in the past with a poorly supported CPU and I don’t want to make a similar mistake again.

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    7·
    21 days ago

    I can’t believe this only happened now. Like, why not skip the os, firmware, or whatever it’s called? Sounds like a lazy man’s dream.

    • TCB13@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      20 days ago

      Or… a decent Openwrt router like the Banana Pi BPI-R3. I believe the only argument for those kinds of devices is the Wifi support but I don’t believe the price and specs on the device shared by the OP are reasonable at all. If you don’t need Wifi, then yes, a good SBC and a cheap switch will be a much better alternative.

  • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.ukEnglish
    2·
    21 days ago

    I’d like to replace my router as it’s only acting as a PPPoE modem for my pfSense box - this looks a bit of overkill, but interested if there’s other (open) options?

      • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.ukEnglish
        0·
        20 days ago

        Banana Pi BPI-R3. There is currently no text in this page. You can search for this page title in other pages, or search the related logs, but you do not have permission to create this page.

        Er… thanks?

        In other articles, I’m reading that Banana Pi quality control isn’t that great, so I’m currently feeling that this might not be boards I am looking for