So they got all that money from Uncle Sam’s CHIPS Act only to lay off 10,000 employees and make themselves “lean”. Govt funded unemployment.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Two generations of bad cpu’s and their solution is get rid of the workers so they can keep their bonuses.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    There’s a dude in wallstreetbets who dumped a $700k inheritance into Intel stocks. lol

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    In January 2022, Intel announced an initial $20 billion investment that will generate 3,000 jobs,

    Not sure why Biden didn’t put any terms and conditions on giving away all this money 💰?

    • arc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The US and Europe has become acutely aware that too much semi-conductor manufacturing has been outsourced to China and other Asian nations and they’re trying to build some back domestically. So that’s the geopolitical reason for it.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    While Intel has absolutely been losing money on its chipmaking Foundry business as it invests in new factories and extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography, to the tune of $7 billion in operating losses in 2023 and another $2.8 billion this quarter, the company’s products themselves aren’t unprofitable.

    So what I’m getting here is that the CEO and or the board decided to invest in something that is losing a ton of money and so now 15% or more of the people who have been working diligently to actually make the company money are going to pay for it by losing their job.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      So what I’m getting here is that the CEO and or the board decided to invest in something that is losing a ton of money

      Intel has an enormous technical debt that they’re finally struggling to pay back after they hit a brick wall with their 7nm Titanium chipset.

      It isn’t that this is wasteful spending so much as it is big upfront costs for future productive development.

      That said, the fact that this work has to be government subsidized in order to be done raises the question of why this business is private at all.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s definitely a huge issue but they’re going to have a hell of a time on the overcooked processors on the market right now. They’ve sold a hell of a lot of defective product over the past couple of years. Consumers and third parties are going to come after them for refunds. Consumer confidence is way down. They’re going to have a hell of a time trying to sell 15th gen to people. Everyone I know who knows what in the hell is going on is going to AMD.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Consumer confidence is way down. They’re going to have a hell of a time trying to sell 15th gen to people. Everyone I know who knows what in the hell is going on is going to AMD.

        I’ve been in the industry since back when AMD actually was making the processors for Intel. And people have been saying this exact thing every time there’s a fluctuation in the processor market. Yet Intel still basically owns the market anyway.

        The failure in Intel isn’t their processors, it’s their management.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think it’s even more absurd than that. The CEO/board decided to make a long-term investment which wasn’t going to pay off for several years. To what should be the surprise of no one, that meant short term losses.

      Framing an investment in a massive amount of new infrastructure as a loss because it didn’t immediately start operating in the black is beyond unreasonable, but that’s the demand when all that matters is quarterly gains and year-over-year growth.

  • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    What’s crazy to me is that they are laying off more employees than the total number of full time employees I’ve worked at for most companies.

    They are laying off 12% of their work force.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s what happens when companies are too fucking big, and intel was essentially a monopoly for a while.

      I have interned at AT&T while at University, laying off a 1000 people would be less than 1 % for them.