• AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Nearly all social media is full of eco echo chambers… I still post and follow stuff on several of the platforms. There is very little nuanced conversation… Seems like it is more and more just an up vote or downvote storm, or people claiming one thing or another without any supporting evidence.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 days ago

      And that makes me genuinely sad. When I joined Lemmy, I was a little put off by the leftist bent here, but then I realized that I appreciated being challenged on my views, especially since people here are generally nice about it.

      I wish I could find something like that for conservatives as well. Better yet, I wish there was a place like Reddit or Lemmy where all views were respected, provided claims are supported with evidence. Unfortunately, that doesn’t seem to be compatible with the world we live in, and that makes me sad.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          I honestly don’t care about centrism, I care about diversity of ideas with citations for claims. If a left wing or right wing policy is the best for a given situation, I’d love to discuss it.

          But failing that, I’ll take centrist over either political extreme any day of the week.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Being a Reich Winger is incompatible with rational or thoughtful discussion.

        Reich wing ideology boils down to subservience and deference to authority, not knowledge.

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            Reich Wing ideology, the entire thing, relies on subservience and deference to authority. The difference in the various flavors of it are just how much and who.

              • ubergeek@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                17 days ago

                Of course, discussing political ideology is “partisan”… Its exactly what we’re talking about.

                And no, they’re not just talking points, it’s literally how we describe the various systems of political ideology… Reich Wingers look to construct a society around control and subservience. And, like I said, the question of “who” to obey, and how strictly people are to be controlled are what differentiates the various Reich Wing ideologies.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  Reich Wingers look to construct a society around control and subservience.

                  This is a talking point, and you’re basically implying everyone on the right believes this, and that’s patently false.

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    I look at it this way: I don’t let in the crazy person on the street screaming racist garbage into my house, so I also don’t have to listen to or engage with that person on the internet, either. That doesn’t make my house an “echo chamber.”

    For a long time I tried to treat “internet people” with some level of “respect” so to say. That is, I didn’t spend time blocking people and whatnot. But now? Screw em. I don’t have time to listen to nonsense, so if someone tries to come in to a conversation in bad faith, it’s very easy to block and move on.

    Or on short-form social media like Bsky or Masto or whatever if someone posts a racist thing. Or a bigoted thing. Block and move on.

    Those trolls live off of engagement so just don’t give it to them. And those same trolls are the ones complaining about “echo chambers.” “Waaa, no one wants to listen to my racist nonsense. It’s an echo chamber!” No, you are just a trash human, and no one is obligated to listen to you.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 days ago

      Those trolls live off of engagement

      Not anymore. Back in the day trolling was a recreational activity done for fun. Deny the fun, cut off the troll’s food. Now it’s being done for political purposes, so cutting off the fun no longer functions since it no longer strikes at the primary motivation.

      • garretble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 days ago

        The result for the people who block them is still the same, though: they no longer see the troll garbage.

      • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        It decreases the spread. Cutting form the engagement means free people who aren’t already subscribed to that content will see it, since there’s fewer people arguing with it. Which means those who are susceptible to falling for it have less chance to even encounter it, meaning fewer fall into it.

        Even if the incentive to create the trolls has changed, the counter to letting it spread hasn’t.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Depends on platform I suppose. Here, the level of activity is low enough that if you’re reading the comments, you’re usually reading all of them. In a major reddit sub that is seldom the case.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    18 days ago

    Echo chambers are on par with human nature: we fear the unknown and flock to like-minded people. It takes a degree of discomfort to read something you don’t agree with (explained rationally and with civility) and trying to argument in kind - it’s easier to down-vote and here we are…

  • Juice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 days ago

    I doubt that it can be any worse than tech companies with financial incentives doing it. Surrounding yourself with like minded people will surely cause some bubbles like that but since when is letting a targeted algorithm funneling us for ad revenue a better option? I don’t personally think it’s a big deal and guessing that people are just upset that their obsession with mass engagement is getting shook.

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    I don’t know how it could get any worse than now. Basically we’re all in echo chambers whichever platform you use. Including Lemmy.

    Agreement with “consensus” of whatever bucket you’re placed into is rewarded, and disagreement is punished. Even if only by upvote/downvote. Switching platforms won’t change much.

    • demesisx@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      If you stray from world, things are a bit better. World, however, hasn’t seen a ban or anti-free speech action they didn’t embrace fully. World is a cesspool of smug libs that refuse to engage with anyone they perceive to be on their left or right.

          • michael@lemmy.chrisco.me
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 days ago

            I haven’t had any issues with .world. Ive had more issues with smaller instances banning people/topics. World seems like the most bland or popular of the lemmy instances.

            • demesisx@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              18 days ago

              Most of the issues I have with world are invisible because the comments are removed and the users are banned. As long as you stick with their narrative (that Trump bad and Biden/Kamala good) you won’t run afowl of them.

              • michael@lemmy.chrisco.me
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                18 days ago

                Cant you see everything via the modlist + API? I thought that was one of the benefits of Lemmy is that the modlist is open. I have seen people down-voted for specific comments but not banned.

                • demesisx@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  18 days ago

                  Many have been banned. A leftist named linkerbaan (or to like that) was one for sure.

  • alienghic@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    Being around too many antagonistic people is stressful.

    “The impact of election stress: Is political anxiety harming your health?: Psychological science shows that politics can harm our physical and mental health, but the positive aspects of political engagement can lead to greater well-being”

    “In polarized communities, they found that bonding ties, or bonds between people who are similar (in this case, politically similar), were linked with better physical and mental health (International Political Science Review, Vol. 75, No. 3, 2022). Bridging ties—connections with dissimilar people—were associated with worse overall health for people who were politically isolated.”

    https://www.apa.org/monitor/2024/10/managing-political-stress

    There’s a big difference between analyzing your enemy and letting them shout at you constantly. I can research conservative evangelicals attitudes without having to let one set up a loudspeaker next to my house.

    The conservative troll types are also the ones most likely to try and argue about echo chambers because their style of rage farming doesn’t work if everyone avoids them.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/01/owning-the-libs-is-the-only-gop-platform/676692/

  • AnotherWorld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    The echo chamber is a good thing. For some reason, everyone thinks I’m obligated to read their opinions that disagree diametrically with mine, constantly, non-stop, from hundreds of thousands of bots working for propaganda. I don’t.

    • beatnixxx@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      The freedom of speech crowd isn’t real big on the other half of the equation. Freedom of association. No one is obligated to listen to anyone else’s bullshit. They’re free to be butthurt about it, I’m free to not give a shit.

  • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Far right radicalization will get worse if progressives leave X. Conservatives will stick around simply because they aren’t banned and then the white supremacists will be free to start pulling them without push back.

  • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    I’ve been on Bluesky very early on, and with the mass exodus of liberals from twitter, they are recreating their own toxic echo chambers on Bluesky now and it’s bleeding through into every post they disagree with.

  • demesisx@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    It’s a valid claim, IMO. The libs leaving Twitter all seem to be VERY into Orwellian practices like “official block lists” and other absurd self-owns.

      • demesisx@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Group efforts to root out fascism or other malcontents

        You can read those words, right? Who decides what is and isn’t fascism? Who decides who is the malcontents in society? See what I mean?

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          Fascism has a very clear definition. And who decides the malcontents? That’s also easy: Are you trying to harm people? Then you are a malcontent.

          You are attempting to obfuscate the discussion here. We all know what fascism is. We also all know its wrong to hurt people.

          • demesisx@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            You can barely detect your own biases! Have a great day. Continue with the fascist bullshit pretending you are ordained from some higher power.

            Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.

            • ubergeek@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              Nothing in there contradicts what I said here… There’s not fascist about preventing fascism from taking root. You’re making the same mistake made in “On Authority”, and calling revolutions where the people cast off their chains of oppression as “Authoritarian”…

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          That people create blocklists that become popular absolutely does not prove endorsement of a potential official blocklist. While an official, default blocklist may be Orwellian, unofficial opt-in blocklists that require searching for are not Orwellian at all. One knows they’re there, one chooses to block them. Your line of reasoning leads to arguing against the block feature entirely. And what’s wrong with providing transparent statistics?

        • dingdongmetacarples@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          Talk about blaming the victim. I’d challenge you to create an account and put that you’re trans in the profile. See how long it takes to get death threats. There is a reason for these block lists. Maybe people don’t want to get harassed every time they post something.

          Also, where is the “most blocked accounts” list in that link?

  • canadaduane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Unpopular opinion: It’s time to bring back church.

    No algorithms controlling you; locally based and strengthens community; a broad spectrum of rich and poor meeting and being seen; opportunities to care and be cared about on a weekly basis; opportunities to develop social skills and to really make an impact in your community based on social missions like food banks and myriad activities. Plus, you meet people not because you want to change their minds, but because they’re just there, trying to be better people. And then once in a while, good conversations turn into minds changed.

    Context: I used to be Mormon and left because I no longer believed, but I now see a hell of a lot of good in church, as long as it isn’t a control freak over your life and sense of self.

    • ian@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      Many churches have a bible that the church want’s you to believe without question. Which is known as faith. It is better to question everything.

    • synnny@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      It works because you’ve got people who share a potent, vast common ground — being Christians.