• Successful_Try543@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sorry, I mixed that up. It was named Canonical partner or something like that and contained only binary packages. Debian contrib are free packages with dependencies in non-free. While non-free are packages with not DFSG compliant source code (but with source code).

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That is not correct. Nonfree has software that is proprietary but jot firmware. Nonfree-firmware has the proprietary firmware.

      • Successful_Try543@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yes, since Bookworm, there is also non-free-firmware which before was located in non-free. I’ve skipped that for simplicity, as both follow the same rules and non-free-firmware was introduced basically for convenience.

        Do you know if either of the non-free repos contain binary files without having the source available?

          • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            OK, TY. I’ve thought, there were just downloader packages, containing scripts to download the firmware binary from the device manufacturer and install it on the system, like e.g. the one for the Broadcom wireless driver.

            • pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              That would be contrib - free software that downloads or relies on non-free software. non-free and non-free-firmware just contain straight up non-free (but redistributable) binaries.