The constant argument in this space that you must know the arcane workings of everything you use, is exhausting.
Mastodon: @SeeJayEmm@noc.social
The constant argument in this space that you must know the arcane workings of everything you use, is exhausting.
Just because something doesn’t fit your use case doesn’t make it a terrible product. Portainer isn’t meant to complement managing docker via CLI. It’s meant to be the management interface.
If you want to manage your environment via CLI, I agree, don’t use Portainer. If you’re content (or prefer) a GUI, Portainer is a solid option. Esp if you have multiple hosts or want to manage more than just the compose stack. Last time I checked Dockge doesn’t do either.
Personal preference? I prefer the Portainer’s presentation over the CLI. I especially find it easier to manage networks and volumes.
But my main reason is I have multiple docker hosts and it gives me a “single pane on glass” to manage everything from.
Is feel a lot better about this if it was a “supporter” tag not this “unlicensed” crap.
https://www.wireguard.com/protocol/
Looks like wireguard encrypts traffic to me.
Only by exposing the docker socket. And it doesn’t support managing network or volumes.