• 0 Posts
  • 10 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 2nd, 2020

help-circle
  • ganymede@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlOur phones DO listen to our voices 24x7
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    yeah the level of technical competence on this site has plummeted since the influx of the reddit crowd.

    just enough consumer tech enthusiast knowledge to delude themselves they can smugly and self righteously shit on the average non-tech person.

    and now they’re the majority, drowning out legitimate curiosity by loudly parroting headlines from articles they didn’t even read. slowly turning lemmy into the regurgitated reddit pop media shithole they wanted to escape.

    this topic is especially difficult because of the clear emotional desire for it not to be true. hence the degree of fragile cope in this thread.

    thankfully not everyone here is a lost cause, and you’ve been given some good advice on delineating the other possible causes for what you’ve observed. when we do a careful analysis we must ofc consider all possibilities.

    what i’ve not seen properly acknowledged in this thread, however, is that the possibility of alternative explanations doesn’t preclude the possibility of voice-based surveillance either.




  • ganymede@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlOur phones DO listen to our voices 24x7
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Of course a researcher is never sure something is 100% ruled out. That’s part of how academic research works.

    once again, that isn’t what they were reported to have said. [and researchers don’t need to repeat the basic precepts of the scientific method in every paper they write, so perhaps its worthwhile to note what they were reported to say about that, rather than write it off as a generic ‘noone can be 100% certain of anything’] it’s a bit rich to blame someone for lacking rigor while repeatedly misrepresenting what your own article even says.

    what the article actually said is

    because there are some scenarios not covered by their study

    and even within the subset of scenarios they did study, the article notes various caveats of the study:

    Their phones were being operated by an automated program, not by actual humans, so they might not have triggered apps the same way a flesh-and-blood user would. And the phones were in a controlled environment, not wandering the world in a way that might trigger them: For the first few months of the study the phones were near students in a lab at Northeastern University and thus surrounded by ambient conversation, but the phones made so much noise, as apps were constantly being played with on them, that they were eventually moved into a closet

    there’s so much more research to be done on this topic, we’re FAR FAR from proving it conclusively (to the standards of modern science, not some mythical scientifically impossible certainty).

    presenting to the public that is a proven science, when the state of research afaict has made no such claim is muddying the waters.

    if you’re as absolutely correct as you claim, why misrepresent whats stated in the sources you cite?


  • ganymede@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlOur phones DO listen to our voices 24x7
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    no, they don’t

    Please be careful with your claims.

    In my experience, whenever investigating these claims and refutations we usually find when digging past the pop media headlines into the actual academic claims, that noone has proven it’s not happening. If you know of a conclusive study, please link.

    Regarding the article you have linked we don’t even need to dig past the article to the actual academic claims.

    The very article you linked states quite clearly:

    The researchers weren’t comfortable saying for sure that your phone isn’t secretly listening to you in part because there are some scenarios not covered by their study.

    (Genuine question, not trying to be snarky) Will you take a moment to reflect on which factors may have contributed to your eagerness to misrepresent the conclusions of the studies cited in your article?


  • ganymede@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlOur phones DO listen to our voices 24x7
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Anyone saying they know for 100% certain it’s not happening is probably speaking from their emotional desire for it not to be true - rather than actual fact.

    Anyone who has looked into the actual technical aspects, rather than spouting the usual surface-level “tech facts” or parroting headlines (rather than the actual academic findings), cannot seriously claim to know for certain its 100% not happening.

    @op i would advise caution on stating ‘24x7’ until there is evidence of that specific claim. (unless you’re referring to while voice assistants are enabled.)


  • this is a complex topic and probably belongs in a different thread.

    essentially i don’t personally believe in punishing citizens of a country for the actions of its politicians.

    at best its misguided, at worse it basically empowers politicians on both sides who draw power from friction between citizens of different nations. typical divide and conquer bs.

    why do you not think a software developer wouldn’t have to

    wouldn’t or shouldn’t? if you mean wouldn’t, it’s not surprising and its not the dev’s fault they have to comply with policy, so the criticism is not with them.

    if you mean shouldn’t, i don’t agree with punishing athletes either, but regarding foss specifically, isn’t the “friendly competition” of olympics equivalent to that? sort of. in some ways yes. in other ways its actually the opposite.

    collaboration is actually the opposite of competition.

    and while there’s a case for the benefits of healthy sports competition, i don’t believe it truly fulfills the spirit of international goodwill to the degree it says on the packaging. foss an other forms of international collaboration for the betterment of greater society are definitely on a higher rung - in my opinion at least.