You should have though. This type of scanning is the thin end of the wedge to complete surveillance. If it’s added, next year it’s extended to cover terrorism. Then to look for missing people. Then “illegal content” in general.
The reason most people seem to disagree with you in this case is that you’re wrong
I didn’t claim there are any nazis, read again.
There are certainly nazis on twitter though, now that you brought it up, and Musk seems to like them
I get it, My point was needlessly pedantic. Sorry about that
You’re strangely angry
The problem isn’t that the model doesn’t know when it doesn’t know. The models never know. They’re text predictors. Sometimes the predictive text happens to be right, but the text predictor doesn’t know.
They never know about something though. They are just text randomisers trained to generate plausible looking text
People have been trying that for years without apparent success. Let’s try shunning the antisocial people instead. We didn’t defeat the nazis by being nice and friendly to them
Besides, journalists being on twitter is one large reason anyone cares about twitter. Getting people to care about a platform not owned by the first lady might be a good idea
People should find a better foundation for self-esteem than hating linux distros. They’re mostly ok, and without debian Linux wouldn’t be what it is today
Preferring a certain distro is fine but why care if others like something else?
Perhaps something like “Google CEO.*(?!head explodes)” Which would match if “Google CEO” isn’t at some point followed by “head explodes”
Gold Sponsor!
I hope so, although it might serve as an easy way for companies to bribe the first lady Musk for favours with Trump
Or run the raid 5 or 6 separately, with hardware raid or mdadm
Even for simple mirroring there’s an argument to be made for running it separately from btrfs using mdadm. You do lose the benefit of btrfs being able to automatically pick the valid copy on localised corruption, but the admin tools are easier to use and more proven in a case of full disk failure, and if you run an encrypted block device you need to encrypt half as much stuff.
You get pretty far with just clone, pull, add, commit, push
the in depth technical details
TL;DR; sigalarm handler calls syslog which isn’t safe to call from a signal handler context.
Their example exploit needed about 10k attempts to get a remote shell so it’s not fast or quiet, but a neat find regardless
Is iCloud a file sharing service or social network in some way? If it isn’t, comparing them with such services makes no sense