A hacked database from AI companion site Muah.ai exposes peoples' particular kinks and fantasies they've asked their bot to engage in. It also shows many of them are trying to use the platform to generate child abuse material.

Well, this just got darker.

  • circuscritic@lemmy.caEnglish
    1320·
    2 days ago

    “no sex crimes should be investigated until the Catholic Church and Hollywood have been purged of pedophiles”

    Well, that’s certainly an opinion.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      1711·
      2 days ago

      do you have evidence of a sex crime?

      if so, please report to your local prosecutor and police.

      • deviants@slrpnk.netEnglish
        87·
        2 days ago

        That’s a curious new benchmark for posting comments and opinions on this subject. You can only do so if you also have case files and evidence to forward to local prosecutors and police of crimes in your area.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          68·
          2 days ago

          For that reason, yeah, they probably deserve having a quick review of their life to make sure that’s the only poor choice they’ve made in regards to that particular fantasy.

          my comment addressed this idiotic statement…

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          107·
          1 day ago

          Are you defending the people who used the AI bots as described?

          🤡

          No, I am telling you it is not a crime… learn to read and stop making shit up.

          If you care about sex crimes against children, there are plenty of that happening within your community, tough internet guy…

          • otp@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            49·
            1 day ago

            Lmao…if you don’t see how going “Hey it’s not actually a crime!” sounds like defending them, I can’t help you.

            And “internet tough guy”? Where is that even coming from? Lol

            • bastion@feddit.nlEnglish
              1·
              5 hours ago

              What was that old adage: “i may not hold the opinion you do, but I will defend your right to hold that opinion.”

              I suppose my view on it is similar:

              If you believe that a psychological stance should be punished physically, it might behoove you to realize that you are only permitted to hold that opinion by the good graces of those who, rightly, stand ready to destroy you if you try to enforce that view physically.