I suspect that this is the direct result of AI generated content just overwhelming any real content.

I tried ddg, google, bing, quant, and none of them really help me find information I want these days.

Perplexity seems to work but I don’t like the idea of AI giving me “facts” since they are mostly based on other AI posts

  • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The whole internet is in the process of being filled with garbage content. Search engines are bad but also there’s not much good content left to find (in % of the total)

  • DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    51 minutes ago

    The other day I googled how long should I broil a ribeye steak and the google AI told me to broil it for 45 minutes.

    Broil is the hottest setting on the oven and you’re supposed to broil the meat as close to the burner as possible. This would probably burn down your house.

  • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’ve been trying to use ddg and I just find it infuriating that it never finds what I need, especially if I’m looking for local information about something. Google seems to always prioritize those types of results when I need them (probably because it makes it easier to sell me something).

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    My experience is that search engines are still decent at finding niche information that would normally be hard to find. But for anything mainstream, for instance any household product that should be easy to find information about, instead how about these 300 pages of top 10 lists of Amazon affiliate links buried under AI generated filler?

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    There’s an extension that filters out websites from every engine. So like when you see Quora or other other digital garbage in your result, block it once and you’ll never see another Quora article again.

    Idr the name of the extension - I’ll check when I get home and follow up.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It is, and it’s not just the search engines to blame.

    The content out there is incredibly spammy. It doesn’t pay to create good content. It pays to make a pool of AI gunge based on what people search for and then stick ads on it.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Spam sites laden with key words and massive SEO to farm advertising dollars from clicks long predated AI

      It doesnt help that big search engines like google have realized people will go as far as page 2 or 3 to find the results, so intentionally worsen their search results to increase ads being served.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m going to be honest with you. They feel no worse today than they have for the past ~5+ years or so. SEO blog spam with a dozen paragraphs to tell you exactly one line of information have been around for quite a while. Many of these articles felt generated either from crappy writers or “AI” tools predating the LLMs we have now.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s not just you. Search got worse, and it did so intentionally.

    Ed Zitron lays it all out really well, with all the receipts, but the basic version is this; Google has an incentive to make you search more for the same things, because then they can show you more ads. And google is, first and foremost, an ad delivery company. Every “product” they own is an ad delivery vehicle. It’s not just AI slop that made search based; Google made search bad, and everyone else followed suit, to a greater or lesser degree.

  • catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’ve found that using Kagi, then DDG, then Google always gets me the results I need. But 95% of the time, Kagi gets it.

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I don’t honestly even remember the last time I’ve googled something. Nowdays I’ll just ask chatGPT

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The problem with getting answers from AI is that if they don’t know something, they’ll just make it up.

      • OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        “If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that’s what I’m going to do.”

        • VanceGPT
      • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        LLMs have their flaws but for my use it’s usually good enough. It’s rarely mission critical information that I’m looking for. It satisfies my thirst for an answer and even if it’s wrong I’m probably going to forget it in a few hours anyway. If it’s something important I’ll start with chatGPT and then fact check it by looking up the information myself.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 hours ago

          So, let me get this straight…you “thirst for an answer”, but you don’t care whether or not the answer is correct?

          • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            36 minutes ago

            Of course I care whether the answer is correct. My point was that even when it’s not, it doesn’t really matter much because if it were critical, I wouldn’t be asking ChatGPT in the first place. More often than not, the answer it gives me is correct. The occasional hallucination is a price I’m willing to pay for the huge convenience of having something like ChatGPT to quickly bounce ideas off of and ask about stuff.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Why have you not tried Kagi? If it’s important to you to have good search and you don’t like being spied on and having ads shoved down your throat, it’s worth paying a small fee for quality instead of paying with your privacy for crap results. It’s been a breath of fresh air. Searching is fun again. It also indexes Lemmy. Traditional Search has largely gone to crap, but I’m tired of everyone complaining that these mega companies offering ‘free’ services aren’t holding their end of the deal instead of supporting the people that are doing something about it. I’m not optimistic things like qwant or searx will be sustainable or deliver high quality results, but by all means donate to them with time or money if you believe in them.

    • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Searching is fun again.

      What? When was searching ever “fun”? And when was that even a desirable state? Statements like this contribute to the propensity to dismiss kagi fans as shills.

      • obre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        unnecessary antagonism aside, people have fun learning and satisfying their curiosity, and it’s more rewarding when there’s less bloat to slog through

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        The search problem is largely due to not being the actual customer.

        Look at me. I’m the customer now.

      • Hannes@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        If it’s free then you’re the product

        And if you’re the product then there’s an interest to keep you on the site and show you ads which works best if the first result isn’t the correct one and you need to scroll or even go to page two

        It’s literally the reason why Google got so much worse that they wanted to show more ads to users which wouldn’t work if the best result is always the first

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 hours ago

          If you think paying means you aren’t still the product, I have news for you.

          I don’t need my search history tied directly to a means of payment, and not because I search for illicit stuff, but because I don’t need an advertising profile built on me that is absolutely tied to me now, because I paid for it.

          If Kagi doesn’t turn out to be selling that info in a year or two, I’ll eat a bug.

          • babybus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Exactly. A paid search engine is a privacy nightmare, and you have zero guarantees that they don’t monetize you one way or another in addition to the subscription fee.