Exactly! I was just saying the same thing in another post!

Whenever I see these articles, I feel like it’s part of OpenAI’s marketing strategy to use the fear-based media to pump up the sense of how revolutionary their tech is

Yep, I think that’s what’s going on too.

Because I’ve posted articles about her? I post articles about all third parties. I don’t write them, I post them. I’m not “tooting her horn.”

I just posted an article about the libertarian party today. Am I “tooting their horn”?

The vast majority of posts I make are about socialism, to the socialist communities (over 450 articles/comments). Feel free to look: https://lemmy.world/c/socialist

That’s tooting a horn, friend. lol

I don’t create the news, I read it and post it. If you don’t like it, then feel free to move on.

you’ve been on a Jill Stein kick

I’m not voting for Jill Stein.

No one is reaching out to editors for seeing an article on Lemmy. We’re gonna go at the user who brought it here instead.

Exactly my point though. I KNOW you all just go after the user. Think about that for a second. Ever hear, “don’t kill the messenger”?

I would prefer people refrain from personal attacks and stay civil. This is a political news community, and it’s a political news article.

I didn’t write it. So it’s silly coming after me. I didn’t make the news, I posted it. And unless you are all censoring different points of view, I’m not sure why you are so angry.

I’m not even voting for Stein. lmao

There are 1,000’s of pro-harris articles. I promise you guys will be just fine if a few third party articles are dropped in here. It’s not like an article can change the minds of a Lemmy user and make them suddenly stop supporting Harris.

You all need to calm down. lol Some of the comments I get are hilarious. You all act like I am bringing about the end of the world. Trump won’t even win. So calm yourself.

I didn’t write the news guys. It’s already out there for the world to see. And no one in this small Lemmy community is suddenly gonna change their mind over a news article. You’re not losing any Harris votes because I posted an article. :)

So all the 1,000’s of pro-harris that are on there, and the many that get posted daily, those are all “editorial” choices?! LMAO Riiiigggghhht…

If you don’t like the articles I post, feel free to block me. If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn’t align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!

No, I think they should be shared without bias

Any bias you have is on you. I just shared an article. I didn’t write it.

You’re the type of user to make an entire post about another user and then cut the parts out of your own wrongdoing, I saw that.

Examples? My post history is public. The entire post history of this community is public. And the modlog is public as well. I haven’t hid anything from anyone.

So yeah, I have a problem with the way YOU present information to be biased towards your own opinion.

Then block me. All I do is post the news, I don’t write it. How you view it or the bias you inject into it is your problem, not mine. I literally posted a disclaimer when I posted the article, just so the talk wouldn’t fall into just talking about me. Not my problem if people can’t read the disclaimer.

If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn’t align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!

No, I’m contacting the person spreading it on the Fediverse, you.

So you don’t think certain types of news stories should be shared on the Fediverse then? So are you promoting censorship? Because you seem upset that I am posting news articles about third parties, but you are fine with the 1,000s of articles that are pro-Harris. Right?

So you would prefer I only post news that YOU agree with. Correct?

If you feel any of the content in the article is inaccurate, please feel free to contact the news org that wrote the article.

She specifically said she this it’s wrong what Putin is doing, and this it’s against international law. You are either willfully misinterpreting this or are so disenfranchised from our current political climate that you’re ignoring serious red flags.

She’s defending Putin’s actions, clearly.

I don’t see it that way. She said ““Absolutely, yes. It was wrong, it was a criminal act, it’s a violation of international law.” How do you see that as she is defending his actions?

Her saying that the US and NATO sucks doesn’t support war.

I’m not voting for her, so I don’t care. But you’re wrong.

She said that it was wrong and illegal and that she didn’t agree with it, in the very video you sent!

When asked if she felt it was wrong, she said, “Absolutely, yes. It was wrong, it was a criminal act, it’s a violation of international law.”