No, I’m contacting the person spreading it on the Fediverse, you.
So you don’t think certain types of news stories should be shared on the Fediverse then? So are you promoting censorship? Because you seem upset that I am posting news articles about third parties, but you are fine with the 1,000s of articles that are pro-Harris. Right?
So you would prefer I only post news that YOU agree with. Correct?
No, I think they should be shared without bias and you have a terrible track record just from the comments and posts I’ve seen of your’s. You’re the type of user to make an entire post about another user and then cut the parts out of your own wrongdoing, I saw that. So yeah, I have a problem with the way YOU present information to be biased towards your own opinion. You aren’t presenting information with the intent of sharing knowledge, you share things in a manipulative way that doesnt show the full details of the people you support.
Any bias you have is on you. I just shared an article. I didn’t write it.
You’re the type of user to make an entire post about another user and then cut the parts out of your own wrongdoing, I saw that.
Examples? My post history is public. The entire post history of this community is public. And the modlog is public as well. I haven’t hid anything from anyone.
So yeah, I have a problem with the way YOU present information to be biased towards your own opinion.
Then block me. All I do is post the news, I don’t write it. How you view it or the bias you inject into it is your problem, not mine. I literally posted a disclaimer when I posted the article, just so the talk wouldn’t fall into just talking about me. Not my problem if people can’t read the disclaimer.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn’t align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
So all the 1,000’s of pro-harris that are on there, and the many that get posted daily, those are all “editorial” choices?! LMAO Riiiigggghhht…
If you don’t like the articles I post, feel free to block me. If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn’t align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
I think you should just be prepared to deal with this every time you post bullshit. No one is reaching out to editors for seeing an article on Lemmy. We’re gonna go at the user who brought it here instead.
No one is reaching out to editors for seeing an article on Lemmy. We’re gonna go at the user who brought it here instead.
Exactly my point though. I KNOW you all just go after the user. Think about that for a second. Ever hear, “don’t kill the messenger”?
I would prefer people refrain from personal attacks and stay civil. This is a political news community, and it’s a political news article.
I didn’t write it. So it’s silly coming after me. I didn’t make the news, I posted it. And unless you are all censoring different points of view, I’m not sure why you are so angry.
I’m not even voting for Stein. lmao
There are 1,000’s of pro-harris articles. I promise you guys will be just fine if a few third party articles are dropped in here. It’s not like an article can change the minds of a Lemmy user and make them suddenly stop supporting Harris.
You all need to calm down. lol Some of the comments I get are hilarious. You all act like I am bringing about the end of the world. Trump won’t even win. So calm yourself.
I didn’t write the news guys. It’s already out there for the world to see. And no one in this small Lemmy community is suddenly gonna change their mind over a news article. You’re not losing any Harris votes because I posted an article. :)
I’m actually not angry. Maybe annoyed, how you could tip toe around obvious matters and assert your own reasonings for them while denying upfront evidence. But if I were angry I would have just blocked. I leave you unblocked because I agree and like a lot of the things you posted as UniversalMonk. But with this new moniker you’ve been on a Jill Stein kick and she’s really not a stellar person. Try the community aspects of your ideals, thats what we need right now, grassroots community movements.
No, I’m contacting the person spreading it on the Fediverse, you.
So you don’t think certain types of news stories should be shared on the Fediverse then? So are you promoting censorship? Because you seem upset that I am posting news articles about third parties, but you are fine with the 1,000s of articles that are pro-Harris. Right?
So you would prefer I only post news that YOU agree with. Correct?
No, I think they should be shared without bias and you have a terrible track record just from the comments and posts I’ve seen of your’s. You’re the type of user to make an entire post about another user and then cut the parts out of your own wrongdoing, I saw that. So yeah, I have a problem with the way YOU present information to be biased towards your own opinion. You aren’t presenting information with the intent of sharing knowledge, you share things in a manipulative way that doesnt show the full details of the people you support.
Any bias you have is on you. I just shared an article. I didn’t write it.
Examples? My post history is public. The entire post history of this community is public. And the modlog is public as well. I haven’t hid anything from anyone.
Then block me. All I do is post the news, I don’t write it. How you view it or the bias you inject into it is your problem, not mine. I literally posted a disclaimer when I posted the article, just so the talk wouldn’t fall into just talking about me. Not my problem if people can’t read the disclaimer.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn’t align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
You know that choosing to post something represents an active editorial choice though, right?
Your activity in the forum has become the topic of discussion. You can’t wave your hands and say “It’s not me, take it up with someone else”.
So all the 1,000’s of pro-harris that are on there, and the many that get posted daily, those are all “editorial” choices?! LMAO Riiiigggghhht…
If you don’t like the articles I post, feel free to block me. If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn’t align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
I think you should just be prepared to deal with this every time you post bullshit. No one is reaching out to editors for seeing an article on Lemmy. We’re gonna go at the user who brought it here instead.
Exactly my point though. I KNOW you all just go after the user. Think about that for a second. Ever hear, “don’t kill the messenger”?
I would prefer people refrain from personal attacks and stay civil. This is a political news community, and it’s a political news article.
I didn’t write it. So it’s silly coming after me. I didn’t make the news, I posted it. And unless you are all censoring different points of view, I’m not sure why you are so angry.
I’m not even voting for Stein. lmao
There are 1,000’s of pro-harris articles. I promise you guys will be just fine if a few third party articles are dropped in here. It’s not like an article can change the minds of a Lemmy user and make them suddenly stop supporting Harris.
You all need to calm down. lol Some of the comments I get are hilarious. You all act like I am bringing about the end of the world. Trump won’t even win. So calm yourself.
I didn’t write the news guys. It’s already out there for the world to see. And no one in this small Lemmy community is suddenly gonna change their mind over a news article. You’re not losing any Harris votes because I posted an article. :)
I’m actually not angry. Maybe annoyed, how you could tip toe around obvious matters and assert your own reasonings for them while denying upfront evidence. But if I were angry I would have just blocked. I leave you unblocked because I agree and like a lot of the things you posted as UniversalMonk. But with this new moniker you’ve been on a Jill Stein kick and she’s really not a stellar person. Try the community aspects of your ideals, thats what we need right now, grassroots community movements.